جزییات کتاب
کتاب «دانشنامه فلسفه استنفورد» اثر «جمعی از نویسندگان» است. در این مورد آمده است: «دانشنامه فلسفه استنفورد، دانشنامهای رایگان و برخط است که توسط دانشگاه استنفورد اداره میشود و از سال ۱۹۹۵ به سرپرستی دکتر ادوارد ن.زالتا آغاز به کار کرده است. مدخلهای این دانشنامه توسط کارشناسان در آن زمینه کاری از بیش از ۶۵ نهاد جهانی نوشته میشوند. نویسندگان مدخلها اجازه میدهند که مقالاتشان به طور رایگان منتشر شود ولی حقتکثیر مقالهها برای نویسندگان محفوظ میماند. مقالههای این دانشنامه علاوه بر اینکه توسط ویراستاران مورد بازبینی قرار میگیرند، توسط دانشوران دیگر نیز مورد داوری همتا قرار میگیرند.» این مجموعه کتاب را نشر «ققنوس» چاپ کرده و در اختیار خوانندگان قرار داده است.
The combination of features exhibited by the SEP publishing model distinguishes it from other attempts to build scholarly resources on the web. Our open access model has the following features: (1) a password-protected web interface for authors, which allows them to download entry templates, submit private drafts for review, and remotely edit/update their entries (2) a password-protected web interface for the subject editors, which allows them to add new topics, commission new entries, referee unpublished entries and updates (updates can be displayed with the original and updated versions side-by-side with the differences highlighted) and accept/reject entries and revisions (3) a secure web server for the principal editor, by which the entire collaborative process can be managed with a very small staff (the principal editor can add people, add entries, assign entries to editors, issue invitations, track deadlines, publish entries and updates, etc.) (4) a tracking system which logs the actions taken at the web interfaces, monitors the state of every entry, determines who owes work and when, automatically sends occasional, friendly email reminders, and provides a summary to the principal editor (5) software which dynamically cross-references the SEP when new entries are published, and which periodically checks for broken links throughout the content (6) software which automatically creates an archive every quarter, providing the proper basis for scholarly citation and (7) mirror sites at universities in other parts of the world, which provide faster access to readers worldwide, provide access when the Stanford server is down for maintenance, and safeguard the digital content as extra backups. The SEPs publishing model therefore has the ability to deliver, with very low administrative and production costs, quality content meeting the highest of academic standards via a medium that is universally accessible.Few dynamic reference works have been built to the specifications described in the previous paragraph. Most of the other encyclopedia projects available on the web lack some of the dynamic and scholarly features of the SEP. Either they (1) are costly and behind a subscription wall, invisible to search engines and so not as useful to academics and the general public or (2) dont have an administrative system capable of screening new entries and updates prior to publication and ensuring that entries are responsive to new research, or (3) dont allow the authors/editors to directly contact the server to update/referee the content of the entries or (4) lack a system of archives for stable, scholarly citation (thus, when entries change, the old content is just lost, and any citations to, or quotations from, prior content become impossible to verify), or (5) lack a university-based Advisory Board to vet the members of its Editorial Board.The SEPs model may therefore represent a unique digital library concept: a scholarly dynamic reference work. A scholarly dynamic reference work differs from an academic journal, for academic journals (1) do not typically update the articles they publish, (2) do not aim to publish articles on a comprehensive set of topics, but rather, for the most part, publish articles that are randomly submitted by the members of the profession, (3) do not aim to cross-reference and create links among the concepts used in the articles they publish, (4) typically serve a narrow audience of specialists, and (5) do not have to deal with the asynchronous activity of updating, refereeing, and tracking separate deadlines for entries, since they are published on a synchronized schedule. Moreover, our reference work differs from a preprint exchanges, for the latter not only exhibit features (1), (2), (3), and (4) just mentioned, but also do not referee their publications and so need not incorporate a work-flow system that handles the asynchronous refereeing process that occurs between upload and publication in a dynamic reference work. None of this is to say that electronic journals and preprint exchanges have a faulty design, but rather that a scholarly dynamic reference work is a distinctive new kind of publication that represents a unique digital library concept.